Car Videos
Car Related Videos
Car Sponsors
You like it? Share it!
Search
Car Videos
Currently Watching: Watching: Hydrogen Torch Hydrogen Car
Sponsored Links
Video scenes shots:

Watch the video:
| URL: | |
| Embed: |
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
Other videos by this author:
![]() |
Low Level Flying #4 Posted by: detwilers
Video duration: 263 seconds Low Level Flying Related: low, level, flying, jet, fighter, buzz, airplane, pass, crash, cockpit, boeing, aerobatics, fast, high, speed, landing, crosswind, flip Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |


Latest comments made on this video:
By: MRJOSEPHKING1971. on 19 Jan 10, 19:57:45
wow i need some of this we all NEED THIS were is it ??????
By: potheadpenguin. on 22 Nov 09, 23:22:10
This is BS, there is nothing "unique" about electrolysis, either you us electrolysis or you don't. Secondly, he may be able to run his car solely on water but he will just be loosing energy through the splitting. Rules of thermodynamics: 1. you cannot win 2. you cannot draw 3. you can only lose Thirdly, hydrogen makes an orange flame when it burns and you sure as hell can't put your finger in it for very long either
By: Develop247. on 05 Nov 09, 16:36:14
If you do happen to come across any further information and happen to be on youtube. please let me know any further information.
By: FreeGlobalEnergy. on 31 Oct 09, 19:59:09
Google: SRA H2O Welder I have no idea if that company is legit or not, I am always very cautious of scammers. I found that company through a keyword search for: Buy H20 welder
By: Develop247. on 31 Oct 09, 06:44:18
ok in another sense. Can i find this machine for my business? if yes, where? if not, when will one be made? how much will this cost?
By: LaRoucheisright. on 20 Aug 09, 12:04:26
There is no way for the massive production of hydrogen unless you use nuclear fission economically only nuclear is efficient enough to do it. Nuclear fission produces the energy flux density required to do it and make the fuel much cheaper than gasoline.
By: droidhunter. on 12 Aug 09, 22:34:27
i heard he was killed
By: 9Paradigm. on 05 Aug 09, 01:13:17
Ok, a third grader knows how to produce hydrogen, but how the hell does he get it under pressure and pure as it is? That is the real question. Or how much electricity does it take to fill the tank? Does HHO production involve electrolysys?
By: lee5537. on 19 Mar 09, 16:09:30
When a fuel cell separates hydrogen and oxygen, you get twice as much hydrogen as you do oxygen. This is where you get H2O from , The oxygen is released into the air and the world could always use more oxygen. So I see it as a win, win situation.
By: FreeGlobalEnergy. on 24 Jan 09, 03:56:40
Thanks for answering that question. I still may ask a scientist that question whenever I should happen to encounter one. I believe the process the oil/hydrogen companies want to put in place makes it more expensive by processing it then transporting it just like gasoline to a station. Advanced electronics can produce it on demand on the vehicle using whatever energy it takes to run the engine. Stanley Meyers, now the Japanese Water Car is all on demand. It's in the electronics set up.
By: TheRealSiguy. on 23 Jan 09, 23:43:44
HHO is not a compound, it's a mixture, of oxygen (oxidizer) and hydrogen (fuel) in a 1:2 molar ratio. Burn it and you get H20 the same amount of HHO since HHO is separated water. As I said, separating water takes more energy than heat generated from combining hydrogen and oxygen molecules (burning).
By: TheRealSiguy. on 23 Jan 09, 23:37:10
It is exactly the same as any water, H2O. Two hydrogen atoms bonded to one oxygen. Burning turns HHO into H2O, releasing heat energy. But do to the laws of energy conservation, it takes more energy to electrolyze it or otherwise separate the oxygen and hydrogen atoms to make HHO again, than it will release when you burn the HHO. So there is no "burnt" water, what he was saying is that all water is "burnt" since it is an oxide, but it can be electrolyzed to make fuel.
By: FreeGlobalEnergy. on 23 Jan 09, 23:36:57
Also, anything that catches on fire is burnt, its gone never to return. What you are talking about is on the surface, you see hydrogen that comes from water go into combustion then water come out. It's not that simple. Take it a step further, look at everything on a molecular scale. Draw up a picture of H20 molecules, then draw up HH0 molecules, these are burnt, they ignite. If they never burnt up then you would have a perpetual system plugging the tail pipe to the intake which won't work
By: FreeGlobalEnergy. on 23 Jan 09, 23:28:17
Let me rephrase: We take H20, electrolyze it taking HHO then burn it as Hydrogen not H20. H20 (water) never entered combustion therefore if HHO entered combustion then it is impossible that H20 comes out of the tail pipe, it's something else that only looks like water(H20) I want to know what that is on a molecular scale. The "water" that comes out of the tail pipe I was told can not be re burnt.
By: TheRealSiguy. on 23 Jan 09, 02:41:15
Water already is oxidized. Burning just means rapid acquisition of oxygen, so when you burn hydrogen, you get water. It is not "burnt" water, it's just water. Separate the oxygen and hydrogen by electrolysis, burn them, and you get water again. It will always make water. Yes, there is such thing as water with an extra oxygen molecule, it's called hydrogen peroxide. But it is unstable and decomposes on contact with a catalyst. The amount of H2O2 created by burning hydrogen is negligible.
By: FreeGlobalEnergy. on 10 Dec 08, 00:58:39
So if the water emissions is a form of oxidized water that cannot be burnt again then are we heading for a future where we burn up all of the usable water supplies? Then can the oceans fish live in this oxidized water? can man drink this water & survive? are we heading for an unforeseen doomsday where we alter our only water supply that kills ocean life & mankind? If fish & man can drink from the tail pipe & live, then we will be fine, but can we?
By: gregrutz. on 09 Dec 08, 04:36:06
Hydrogen is a rare gas, burn it and you get water, a stable compound. Water is already burnt (oxidized) so you can't burn it again to get more energy.
By: gregrutz. on 09 Dec 08, 04:31:12
It takes water AND electricity :54 to cut metal. Remember, water is burnt hydrogen, it takes a lot of electricity to unburn it so you can burn it in your hummer.
By: VictorRussellville. on 01 Nov 08, 00:49:32
How does this alternative fuel source effect the life of the vehicle? Are these vehicles available for sale?
By: Mastervitro. on 08 Oct 08, 05:49:45
100 miles 4 ounces 25 miles per ounce 128 ounces in gallon 25 x 128 = 3200 3200 miles to the gallon!
By: FrigginSmift. on 10 Sep 08, 20:32:43
H20 is liquid water, HHO is a gas comprised of two parts hydrogen to one part oxygen
By: sheelty123. on 07 Sep 08, 00:47:19
I don't understand. What is the difference between HHO and H2O? Aren't they the exact same thing? I'm not a very good chemist...
By: thompson49022. on 01 Sep 08, 18:11:57
Many water for fuel guys are fake, this guy however is not. HHO torches are a fact. Other companies sell them across the globe.
By: hybridfuelkits. on 09 Aug 08, 17:32:08
A couple of amazing properties hho gas has. The torch bit is just wicked. Apparently there is no known limit to the amount of heat that can be created.
By: FreeGlobalEnergy. on 08 Aug 08, 15:58:59
I.e. Honda's FCX Clarity Interesting car. Some here want to argue hydrogen is way too expensive, do you know how much each cell pack will cost? I have given my theories that gas is purposely being jacked up so hydrogen then appears & will be a lower cost alternative in order to force auto sales. I worry Honda is only leasing, that's what GM did with the EV-1,then when a controlled oil supply rebounds they yank the H car & go back to gas.