Car Videos
Car Related Videos
Car Sponsors
You like it? Share it!
Search
Car Videos
Currently Watching: Watching: Run you car on water and nothing else.
Sponsored Links
Video scenes shots:
Watch the video:
| URL: | |
| Embed: |
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
Other videos by this author:
 |
Low Level Flying #4 Posted by: detwilers
Video duration: 263 seconds Low Level Flying Related: low, level, flying, jet, fighter, buzz, airplane, pass, crash, cockpit, boeing, aerobatics, fast, high, speed, landing, crosswind, flip Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
Latest comments made on this video:
By: MOTROIT. on 02 Feb 10, 17:42:08
Okay what the hell! this video is from 2006! why is there no application for use on our cars???
By: vodaetalon. on 01 Feb 10, 20:45:33
Is it really true? I hope so...
By: automechanic007. on 21 Jan 10, 06:59:38
Check the video response section to see a video on how to save money using HHO technology and how to Run car on water....
By: Jar0Dygert. on 30 Dec 09, 00:18:13
all this is easy and you don't need a machine that big to produce that much HHO. you can make one that's the same size as the mouse you are using for your comuter right now. And he's using it all wrong. He's wasting the patent on this stuff. He needs to make it like open source or whatever you would call it.
By: Jar0Dygert. on 30 Dec 09, 00:16:43
that's not true. it's takes energy to break the bonds but the energy gained from burning HHO is greater.
By: Nox665. on 28 Dec 09, 17:34:14
What ALL this brainless idiots will NEVER understand is that the energy needed to split water into Oxygen & Hydrogen will always be higher then the energy obtained from the combustion of the 2 gases -.-
By: pballmaster27. on 06 Dec 09, 07:32:00
Ok i am an 11th grade student and what he is doing is using 12 volt and metal plates and water but if he would use baking soda in there it would produce more hydrogen in his generator look on ebay they sell hydrogen generators on there
By: Quakestar08. on 01 Dec 09, 00:34:55
LAWL. This makes no sense. wtf is powering the machine to make hydrogen??? FOSSIL FUEL from the power plants! and how do you convert H2O into H2, convert that into electricity, use that to break the bonds, and get excess energy? it's like having over 100% efficiency, which having 100% efficiency is nearly impossible already. Haha. go to school and learn the laws of conservation then go build something worthwhile and stop scamming people.
By: morrisburger1. on 23 Nov 09, 17:58:54
Using grid power is a step up from using petrol, It keeps the pollution in a tight and controllable area and off of our streets. I agree that a decent electric car would be the best way forward, but at present that would cost the governments of the world billions in lost oil revenues / taxes, so it probably wont happen until the people make it happen.
By: proaudiohd. on 23 Nov 09, 05:20:02
This isnt running your car 'on water', its running your car on grid electricity. So given that, its a much better use of electricty to charge a battery and power a brushless electric motor. Hydrogen is a complete sidestep. I'd love to see all these HHO people realize how their efforts would be better served developing better batteries.
By: ladivadivala. on 21 Nov 09, 03:43:52
Amazing. The answer to getting away from fossil fuels has been around from the beginning of the auto industry. Henry Ford built his first cars to run on Hemp fuel and he even made his cars out of Hemp. The Hemp made car was ten times stronger than steel cars and the fuel is so clean you can drink it. Don't believe me look it up for yourselves. Amazing all the damage done to the human race by simply making a plant illegal. The truth is growing though.
By: OldSchoolSkill. on 20 Nov 09, 08:19:41
Antalz, Thanks for your sensible comment. You are right, HHO is a common gas-industry name for: 2 parts hydrogen : 1 part oxygen... in other words, disassociated WATER. Any middle-school science student SHOULD know how to separate the two elements from water using electrolysis. It's very easy to do. The only problem is that this process can never deliver as much energy as it took to make it. Once again, FOX news promotes lies and excites ignorant people with pseudo-science.
By: morrisburger1. on 19 Nov 09, 03:31:50
It does have something to do with electrode materials and their properties. What is neede most of all though is a government funded project to find the most efficient way of doing it.
By: antalz. on 17 Nov 09, 21:39:27
It has nothing to do with electrode material. Cl- just lets go of it's electron faster than H2O breaks apart. Competing half reactions. Better way to go is to use sulferic acid, or potassium/sodium hydroxide. Those will increase conductivity, without competing with water at the positive electrode
By: morrisburger1. on 17 Nov 09, 19:32:22
This isn't bullshit, it can be done and it should be done. Your government, no matter which country you live in, will not promote this due to the loss of tax revenue and the pressure from oil companies. You can do it for yourselves and for each other though, and when it's big enough it will be mass produced by people looking for a profit.. Easy, just get it done.
By: morrisburger1. on 17 Nov 09, 19:21:58
You only get Chlorine gas if you do it wrong. Using the correct materials for electrodes and the right current and the right voltage and you can get. ideally, Hydrogen and Oxygen in a ratio of 2:1, you need to do your research to get it right but it's all there. The Chlorine when done properly will be absorbed back in to the water. Of course you need to take care, but that's the same as today with both Petrol and Diesel. Plus this has the added benefit of not poisoning the air
By: antalz. on 17 Nov 09, 17:21:43
You cant use sea water, because of the NaCl. The reason is that, instead of water, Cl- will break down, at the positive electrode, meaning you don't get oxygen gas, but chlorine. Which is toxic, aand HCl, which u get when u mix hydrogen and chlorine, is very corrosive.
By: morrisburger1. on 17 Nov 09, 04:14:49
Sea water is a better fuel as the already present NaCl makes the electolitic process more efficient than with tap water. This does as you say require a lot of energy and the use of a Hybrid vehicles energy storing capabilities will make up for the shortfall you would get from a normal single battery car.
By: morrisburger1. on 17 Nov 09, 04:11:45
I'm just researching at the minute, cos fuck buying petrol if I can fill up from my tap, anyway, HHO is a different molecular structure although as you say the same elements and ratios, it is called Oxyhydrogen and is wide use in industry, check wiki for more details.
By: antalz. on 11 Nov 09, 15:12:39
Sea water to tap water. That involves turning Na+ and Cl- back into NaCl. That takes energy, which is something we don't have much of at the moment
By: antalz. on 11 Nov 09, 15:10:12
HHO... i love that word. They never tell you what it is. I can predict what it is though, a mixture of H2 and O2, 2:1 ratio... It's not special stuff, and making it wont poof energy into existance.
By: jamieo856. on 07 Nov 09, 18:34:11
thaks for introducing that website to people, it really does make sence.
By: neogeon. on 04 Nov 09, 20:13:24
THANK YOU I'm so sick of liberal arts fucknuts that don't understand how basic chemical processes work. No, it's the corporations being all corporationey and making money, right? :roll:
By: alexbalosie. on 29 Oct 09, 22:07:51
people have already made hydrogen engines and the patents have been bought up by gas companies. namely exxon-mobile. props to this guy for doing it himself..
By: britainforwhites. on 28 Oct 09, 20:30:17
3200 miles of driving per gallon of water, quite something